Enrichment of Clinical Study Populations

Abstract

Those who conduct clinical trials “enrich” study populations in a variety of ways in order to identify a population of patients in whom a drug effect, if present, is more likely to be demonstrable. The principal ways to do this are as follows: (i) practical enrichment, i.e., generally seeking to reduce noise (variability of measurement) and heterogeneity (by avoiding the enrollment of patients with other diseases and individuals in whom the disease disappears spontaneously), (ii) prognostic enrichment, i.e., finding patients who are likely to have the event of interest when enrolling for risk‐reduction studies, and (iii) predictive enrichment, i.e., finding the individuals who are more likely to respond. Enrichment fits well into the growing interest in “individualization” of therapy but creates some tension with another trend, namely, the desire for “real‐world studies” with less restrictive entry criteria and other requirements.

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2010) 88 6, 774–778. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.233